Legal Opinion

Weber-Squires Corp. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1935No. 7242Published

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was on a building contract to establish and foreclose a lien for amounts claimed to be due and unpaid. The claim was that the plans and specifications on which the contract was let were different from and much more costly than those on which bids were taken, and that plaintiff, in signing the contract on those plans, had been led by defendant to believe that, except in one particular which had been taken care of in increasing the bid, the plans were not substantially changed.

It was claimed that the result of these changes was to nearly double the cost of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. South Florida Lumber Mills v. BreuchaudCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  2. Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. TreadwayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
  3. Murphy v. India Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
  4. First Nat. Bank v. Fidelity Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API