Murphy v. India Tire & Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought by the appellee on April 1, 1927, to recover possession of described tires and tubes alleged to be in possession of the appellant, and the tires and tubes sued for were seized under a writ of sequestration issued at the instance of appellee. A pleading filed by the appellant made exhibits thereto two written contracts between appellant and appellee, both dated March 4, 1926; one of those contracts being with reference to appellant selling products of the appellee, and the other, herein referred to as the warehouse agreement, being with reference…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- De Witt v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Brunson v. Dawson State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Kleis v. Niagara Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Ryan v. OhmesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- First Nat. Bank v. Fidelity Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Clay v. Connecticut General Life Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Weber-Squires Corp. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935