Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank v. Fidelity Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1934No. 7302PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The Pampa National Bank brought this suit against the Fidelity National Bank to enforce a deposit liability of $7,209. Appellant, First National Bank, as assignee, came in and carried the suit on. The Fidelity Bank defended on the ground that on June 2, 1931, it had appropriated $7,200 the Pampa Bank had on deposit with it by charging the account with a $7,200 note of one Hopkins, theretofore discounted by it for the Pampa Bank. It claimed, and over objection was allowed to prove, that it had done this under a general oral agreement that the Pampa Bank would carry a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. South Florida Lumber Mills v. BreuchaudCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  2. Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. TreadwayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
  3. Goldstein v. Union Nat. Bank of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Northrup National Bank v. Yates Center National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. First National Bank v. WillisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weber-Squires Corp. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API