Legal Opinion

Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. Treadway

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 13, 1923No. 3891PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

There was judgment for defendants below, and the plaintiff assigns error.

Plaintiff manufactures and sells an article which it calls an inner shoe, designed to be placed inside an automobile tire, and between it and the inner tube. The defendants are engaged in Houston in the business of selling automobile accessories. They signed and delivered to plaintiff’s salesman two orders, addressed to the plaintiff, for shipments of inner shoes, which were accepted by the plaintiff. The orders were upon identical printed forms prepared by the plaintiff, and contain the following…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Knabb v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. Harville Rose Service v. Kellogg CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Ragland v. CURTIS MATHES SALES COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. TondroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Fritz v. SkilesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API