Legal Opinion

Tankoos v. Conford Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In the complaint the plaintiffs seek to recover from the defendant for commissions or damages as real estate brokers, and for other services rendered. Three causes of action are stated in a complaint, consisting of twenty-nine paragraphs and covering thirty-three printed pages in the record. The defendant, before answer, moved to strike out certain paragraphs on the ground that the matter contained therein is irrelevant, redundant, repetitious and unnecessary, and for other relief. Section 241 of the Civil Practice Act states the rule in respect to a pleading. When the rule is violated the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gutta-Percha & Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. HolmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Grobman v. FreimanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Drydock Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Queens Machine Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Hewitt v. MaassNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Alpert v. HeinNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Fun Fair Park, Inc. v. Gabor Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API