Alpert v. Hein
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Vincent Keogh, J.
Defendants Hein and Adams have moved to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, for an order requiring plaintiffs to file an amended complaint complying with the provisions of section 241 of the Civil Practice Act and with rules 90 and 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Defendants Rosen and Harris have similarly moved, except that instead of asking for dismissal of the complaint they seek an order striking certain specified allegations of the complaint as indefinite, uncertain and obscure, and as irrelevant and redundant, or alternatively, for an order requiring service of an amended…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Isaacs v. Washougal Clothing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Grobman v. FreimanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Tankoos v. Conford Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Bob v. HecksherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Van Derzee v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meyers v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Williamson v. WilliamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1961