Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cruz Ortega

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 28, 1988No. 2854PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed after appellant was convicted by jury of possession with intent to deliver and criminal conspiracy. On appeal, appellant claims that: (1) the Commonwealth failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant possessed contraband; (2) the evidence was insufficient to prove that appellant actively participated in a conspiracy; and (3) the eleven and one-half to twenty-three month sentence was excessive. We affirm the decision of the trial court.

The trial court put forth the facts as follows.

On May 16, 1986, Detectives…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MacOlinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. MudrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. DavenportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. LawsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. State v. MoralesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. StembridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API