Commonwealth v. Cruz Ortega
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed after appellant was convicted by jury of possession with intent to deliver and criminal conspiracy. On appeal, appellant claims that: (1) the Commonwealth failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant possessed contraband; (2) the evidence was insufficient to prove that appellant actively participated in a conspiracy; and (3) the eleven and one-half to twenty-three month sentence was excessive. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
The trial court put forth the facts as follows.
On May 16, 1986, Detectives…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MacOlinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. MudrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. DavenportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. LawsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. ThompsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- State v. MoralesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Commonwealth v. StembridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.