Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Davis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 4, 1971No. Appeal, 28PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr, Justice Roberts,

Appellant, Alonzo Davis, was convicted of receiving stolen goods. While several issues lurk in this appeal, *13our independent review of the record convinces us that there is insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant ever “received” the merchandise in question. Accordingly, we reverse.

Initially, we note that the conduct of appellant’s self-retained counsel in this case offends the dignity of this Court and has deprived appellant of effective assistance of counsel. This case was argued on October 6, 1970. At that time, counsel for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TIRPAKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. OwensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  3. Bunter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. KauffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Commonwealth v. AultSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. State v. HankersonOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. MacOlinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. MudrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API