Legal Opinion

State v. Morales

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 2002No. 21,324PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Chief Judge.

{1} In this case we decide, as an issue of first impression, that the State must prove the scientific reliability of a drug field test in a manner consistent with the Daubert/Alberico standard, if it wishes to use the results of that test at trial to identify a controlled substance. Because the State offered no such foundation, we reverse Defendant’s conviction for possession of heroin and remand for a new trial on that charge. We affirm Defendant’s remaining convictions for aggravated assault (deadly weapon) and aggravated battery on a peace officer (deadly weapon).

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. CunninghamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. AlbericoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. TollardoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  3. United States v. Rede-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Ramon SilvaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. FernandezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API