Legal Opinion

Smith v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided July 25, 2012No. 3:12-cv-00616-DRH-SCWPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

DAVID R. HERNDON, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The above referenced diversity case is before the Court on the defendant’s, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“BIPI”), motion to dismiss the plaintiffs claims for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.1

*916II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Overview of Related Pradaxa Product Liability Litigation

The above referenced case involves PRADAXA (“Pradaxa”), a prescription pharmaceutical indicated for the prevention of stroke and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Tamayo v. BlagojevichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dolin v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
  2. Albrosco Limited v. Prince Agri Products Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2021
  3. Bounds v. Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
  4. Chryssos v. Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
  5. Datil v. C. R. Bard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API