Legal Opinion

Datil v. C. R. Bard, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 30, 2020No. 1:19-cv-08274Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MARISOL DATIL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 19 C 8274 v. ) ) Judge Sara L. Ellis C.R. BARD, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER After experiencing complications from an implanted Align Urethral Support System (“Align”) manufactured by Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc. (“Bard”), Plaintiff Marisol Datil filed claims against Bard directly in the C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Multi-District Litigation 2187 (“Bard MDL”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. Datil asserts…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Bonte v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API