Augienello v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as Receiver of Superior Bank, FSB (“Superior”) (the “FDIC-Receiver”), has moved to dismiss the amended complaint of pro se plaintiffs Susan Augienello (“Augienello”), Richard J. Doran (“Doran”), Philip Einhorn (“Ein-horn”), Craig Nazzaro (“Nazzaro”) and Eileen Papp (“Papp”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”), pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter and 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons set forth below, the motion…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fred Traguth and Otto Handtke, Individually and Doing Business as Dance Motion Press v. D'LeLa ZuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Robinson v. Overseas Military Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Burgos v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Eisenberg v. New England Motor Freight, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Frisone v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Felipe v. Target Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Phoenix Four, Inc. v. Strategic Resources Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Deadwiley v. New York State Office of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.