People v. Swalm
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and from the judgment rendered upon the verdict of the jury, and an order denying him a new trial, he appeals.
His first claim for the reversal of the judgment and order is, that the property, consisting of certain valuable *48articles of jewelry, which! he is alleged to have stolen, was not the property of the person alleged to be the owner thereof as charged, but was the separate property of his wife.
There is evidence in the record which the jury evidently believed, and which it was their right so to do, which showed that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The People v. . ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Meyer v. KinzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Greiner v. GreinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Pfister v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by13 opinions
- Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. RushingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Directors of Fallbrook Irrigation District v. AbilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.