People v. Rushing
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of th'e Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. E. W. Sisley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
The defendant was charged in the information with the crime of forgery in having, on the thirty-first day of January, 1899, willfully and knowingly uttered and passed as true and genuine a certain false, forged, and counterfeit power of attorney, with intent to cheat and defraud one Levy. He was convicted and judgment entered accordingly. This appeal is from the judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
1. The main point urged upon this appeal is that there is not sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict. It is the settled rule that if the verdict of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. DoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. CroninCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. SwalmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Barfield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Horn v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. Ye FooCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- State v. FlemingIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.