Legal Opinion

United States v. Kramer

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 21, 1998No. Civil Action 89-4340 (JBS), 90-4380 (JBS)PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SIMANDLE, District Judge.

In connection with the remedying of conditions at the Helen Kramer Landfill Superfund Site in Mantua Township, New Jersey, the United States, on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, have filed the present motions for entry of federal and state consent decrees resolving all direct claims of the governments in these multi-party hazardous waste cases arising under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  2. United States v. Charles George Trucking Co., Charles George, Sr. And Dorothy GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. City of New York v. Exxon Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  4. United States v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  5. United States v. Charter International Oil Company, Acushnet Company, Proposed Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bragg v. RobertsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1999
  2. United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
  3. United States v. CantrellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  4. New York v. Solvent Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2003
  5. United States v. Grand Rapids, MichiganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API