Legal Opinion

United States v. Cantrell

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 23, 2000No. C-1-97-981, C-1-98-247PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENTER CONSENT DECREES

DLOTT, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Enter Consent Decrees (doc. 109). The four proposed partial Consent Decrees seek to resolve liability between the Plaintiff United States of America and four sets of Defendants (collectively referred to as the “Settling Parties”) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reorganization Act of 1986 (“SARA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. The United States filed these…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. R.W. Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Centerior Service Company General Electric Company Ashland Oil, Incorporated v. Acme Scrap Iron & Metal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Township of BrightonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
  5. United States v. Akzo Coatings of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Wichita, Kansas v. Trustees of APCO Oil Corp. Liquidating TrustDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  2. Garrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  3. Garrison Southfield Park LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
  4. Olymbec USA LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. Olymbec USA LLC v. Closed Loop Refining and Recovery, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API