Legal Opinion

State v. Nash Runabout

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 27, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

P. L., c. 144, s. 40 provides for the seizure of automobiles engaged in the illegal transportation of intoxicating liquors and for the forfeiture thereof on proceedings in accordance with the provisions of P. L., c. 372. The rights of innocent holders of liens thereon are not excepted from the purview of the statute. Such a holder takes “the chance as to what one in lawful possession of the car might do with it” (State v. Buick Coach, 83 N. H. 288, 289), but his rights are unaffected by the conduct of one who, as against him, never had any rightful possession thereof. The test to determine…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Commonwealth v. Certain Motor VehicleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. White Auto Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alcorn, State's Attorney v. AlexandroviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API