Legal Opinion

Alcorn, State's Attorney v. Alexandrovicz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1931PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

Michael K. Krugelis purchased an automobile of a dealer under a conditional bill of sale by the terms of which the title remained in the seller until the full purchase price was paid. The dealer assigned its interest in the car as conditional vendor to the Commercial Credit Corporation. Alexandrovicz took the car with the knowledge and consent of Krugelis, but without his knowledge that it would be used to transport liquor, and without the knowledge and consent of the Commercial Credit Corporation, and used it in the illegal transportation of intoxicating liquors, for which offense he was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Pickett v. Antonio Marcucci's Liquors & ContainersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. One 1977 Buick AutomobileSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. State v. BucchieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. State v. One 1981 BMW AutomobileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. State v. ConnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. State v. McCarthyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API