State v. Culp
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
Appellant assigns as error the court’s references to defendant in its charge to the jury as “Plarvey Culp, alias James William Hill,” the names used to designate the defendant in the indictment. Description of the accused in a bill of indictment by whatever alias names he may have been known to use, if done in good faith, is proper and may even afford protection to a defendant if called upon to prove former jeopardy. It is true that the use of aliases may at some times be associated in the public mind with the so-called “criminal” class. For that reason some jurisdictions have held that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- United States v. MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Commonwealth v. TorrealbaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Call v. StroudSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- D'ALLESSANDRO v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Culp v. BoundsDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1971
- Thatch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
- State v. MunizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. BumgarnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.