D'ALLESSANDRO v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
There was abundant evidence to support a verdict of guilty in these cases. The sole question is thus one of averred trial errors. There were two indictments. One charged the substantive offense; the other the conspiracy to commit it.
The assignments of error are as follows:
1. The refusal to direct a verdict of acquittal of the substantive charge of transporting a woman intending that she should be induced to engage in prostitution.
We have already disposed of this by the finding that there was evidence to support a verdict of guilty.
2. The like refusal in the…
2Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. GraysonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Commonwealth v. ShelineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- State v. SwiftSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- United States v. MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- State v. LostonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.