Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Wayne Prosecuting Attorney v. Tate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1943No. Docket No. 93, Calendar No. 42,427PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal by the people from a decree dismissing a bill of complaint filed against defendant, Edward R. Tate, under Act No. 389, Pub. Acts 1925 (2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9093 et seq. [Stat. Ann. § 18.901 et seq.]). In their bill of complaint the people sought to confiscate a motor vehicle which was used in connection with gambling, similar to that described in People v. Elliott, 74 Mich. 264 (3 L.R.A. 403, 16 Am. St. Rep. 640).

The people produced a police officer who, while testifying as to the arrest of the occupant of the car and the finding of gambling paraphernalia therein, was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. HolschuhMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Wayne Prosecuting Attorney v. SillMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. MICHIGAN Ex Rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. BENNISMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. STATE, EX REL. WASHTENAW COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State Ex Rel. Wayne Prosecuting Attorney v. WeitzmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. STATE Ex Rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. BENNISMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API