Legal Opinion

People v. Verduzco

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 2012No. B227825PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Defendant Ruben Verduzco was convicted of one count of possession for sale of a controlled substance (methamphetamine) in violation *1410of Health and Safety Code section 11378 (count 4), and one count of possession of an essential chemical sufficient to manufacture hydriodic acid or a reducing agent with intent to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11383.5, subdivision (e) (count 5).1 He contends (1) insufficient evidence supports his conviction for possession of an essential chemical “sufficient to manufacture hydriodic acid or a reducing…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. BrimmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. People v. Rodriguez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. People v. PrescottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  4. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. A.M.California Court of Appeal · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API