Legal Opinion
Hasken v. City of Louisville
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 11, 2003No. Civil Action No. 3:00CV-546-SPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SIMPSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon motion of the plaintiffs, Michael Hasken and Gregg Hasken, on behalf of themselves and all persons similarly situated (“Haskens”) to authorize further proceedings as a collective action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (“ § 216(b)”), and to certify this matter as a class action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 23 (“Rule 23”)(DN-138).
BACKGROUND
This case involves the method by which the City of Louisville (“City”) compensated its firefighters. The Haskens, retired City firefighters, claim that by miscalculating the hourly…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ansoumana v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Sims v. Parke Davis & Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1971
- McGinley v. Burroughs CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Martin v. Dahlberg, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Shain v. Armour & Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leuthold v. Destination America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Landry v. Swire Oilfield Services, L.L.C.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Edwards v. City of Long BeachDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Bustillos v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
- Carnevale v. GE Aircraft EnginesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.