Carnevale v. GE Aircraft Engines
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION. FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. #24); SUCH COMPLAINT IS TO BE FILED FORTHWITH; DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (DOC. # 29)
RICE, Chief Judge.
The Plaintiffs bring this opt-in, collective action against their employer under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201, et ' seq., alleging that the Defendant has violated that law and state statutes by failing to pay them overtime. 1 The Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of all Defendant’s current and former…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.