Legal Opinion

Carnevale v. GE Aircraft Engines

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 20, 2003No. C-1-02-600Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION. FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. #24); SUCH COMPLAINT IS TO BE FILED FORTHWITH; DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (DOC. # 29)

RICE, Chief Judge.

The Plaintiffs bring this opt-in, collective action against their employer under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201, et ' seq., alleging that the Defendant has violated that law and state statutes by failing to pay them overtime. 1 The Plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of all Defendant’s current and former…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  4. Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Musson Theatrical, Inc., and Modernage Photo Service, Inc., for Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API