Legal Opinion

ConocoPhillips Co. v. Ramirez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 2017No. 04-15-00487-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

ConocoPhillips Company and Rodolfo C. Ramirez, Individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Ileana Ramirez, and El Milagro Minerals, Ltd. appeal the trial court’s judgment declaring that appellees Leon Oscar Ramirez, Jr., individually, and Jesus M. Dominguez, as Guardian of the Estate of Minerva Clem-entina Ramirez, an Incapacitated Person, each own a 1/12 mineral interest in the Las Piedras Ranch, and that ConocoPhillips’s three leases are not binding on their mineral interests because, as contingent re-maindermen, they were…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Bocquet v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. XTO Energy Inc. and Mobil Producing Texas and New Mexico, Inc. v. EOG Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
  2. Conocophillips Company, Rodolfo C. Ramirez, Individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Ileana Ramirez, and El Milagro Minerals, Ltd. v. Leon Oscar Ramirez, Jr., Individually, and Jesus M. Dominguez, as Guardian of the Estate of Minerva Clementina Ramirez, an Incapacitated PersonTexas Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API