Legal Opinion

Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 4, 1978No. 47442PublishedCited by 229 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

359 So.2d 430 (1978)

The WACKENHUT CORPORATION et al., Petitioners,

v.

Richard CANTY, Respondent.

No. 47442.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 4, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1978.

James E. Tribble of Backwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl, Miami, for petitioners.

Edward A. Perse of Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, and Ronald I. Strauss of Highsmith, Strauss & Nelson, Miami, for respondent.

SUNDBERG, Justice.

This cause is before us on a petition for writ of certiorari because the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Canty v. Wackenhut, 311 So.2d 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), allegedly conflicts with the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited91 opinions

  1. Cloud v. FallisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. YeattsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  3. James v. PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Northwestern National Casualty Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin v. Edward A. McNulty and Walter Scott SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  5. Carraway v. RevellSupreme Court of Florida · 1959

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by229 opinions

  1. Brown v. Estate of StuckeySupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Bernard Litman v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. BellSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  5. White Const. Co., Inc. v. DupontSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

224 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API