Legal Opinion

Stuyvesant v. Wilcox

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Van Burén. (Buck, J.) Trespass. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action for assault and battery. *235Defendant is the son-in-law of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was the owner of 80 acres of land in the township of Decatur, Yan Burén county. He was a man 79 years of age- On February 4, 1890, he and his wife executed to the defendant a deed of the farm, and took back from the defendant an instrument in the nature of a mortgage, to secure to the plaintiff and his wife their support during the term of their natural lives. At the time of the making of this deed plaintiff was possessed of some considerable personal property, and when he and his wife went…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mooney v. KennettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  2. Ross v. LeggettMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oppenhuizen v. WennerstenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Peisner v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Shehyn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Haviland v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Wingate v. BuntonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API