Legal Opinion
In re Cheyenne A.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 1, 2000No. AC 18994PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The respondent parents (respondents) appeal from the judgment of the trial court terminating their parental rights in their daughter, Cheyenne A. On appeal, the respondents claim (1) that the court improperly determined that a prima facie showing of unexplained injuries constitutes clear and convincing evidence of the cause of those injuries and was evidence sufficient to support the termination of their parental rights under General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 17a-112 (c) (3) (C),1 and (2) that § 17a-112 violates their due *153process rights by permitting the state to terminate…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Johnson v. FlammiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- In re Luis C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boccanfuso v. ConnerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Garrigus v. ViarengoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- In re Egypt E.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- In Re Giovanni C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- In Re Autumn D., (Mar. 8, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.