Legal Opinion
Sheehan v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 1954No. Civ. No. 15773PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIBSON (Lilburn), J. pro tem.*
The respondents here (pla.int.iffs and petitioners in the court below) are members of Automotive Machinists Lodge No. 1305, and are employed by the city and county of San Francisco in the civil service position of automotive machinists. They obtained a judgment and decree of mandamus, declaratory relief, and for compensation against the appellants (defendants in the lower court) with respect to pay for which they claim to be entitled pursuant to section 151.3 of the San Francisco charter, which makes it mandatory upon the city to pay its employees at the same…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Adams v. WolffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Gowanlock v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Adams v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Payne v. Pathe Studios, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Oil Fields Corporation v. HessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aasmundstad v. Dickinson State CollegeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Martin v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Aasmundstad v. Dickinson State CollegeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983