Legal Opinion

Salo v. Nelson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1945No. 29483PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This action was instituted by Victor Salo to recover the principal and interest due on a promissory note from the maker, Thomas Nelson. The note, introduced in evidence as plaintiff’s exhibit A, is dated February 2, 1937, and is signed by Thomas Nelson. By the terms of this instrument, Thomas Nelson agreed to pay to the order of Victor Salo, sixty days after date, the sum of two hundred dollars with interest thereon at the rate of eight per cent per annum from February 2, 1937, interest to be payable at maturity. Endorsed on the note, under date of July 13, 1942, is a payment of fifty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schirmer v. NethercuttWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Child v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Ackerson v. Hama Hama Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allison v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cunningham v. Town of TietonWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ashley v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ashley v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Moore v. KeeseyWashington Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API