Legal Opinion

Ashley v. Hall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1999No. 66578-8PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

978 P.2d 1055 (1999)

138 Wash.2d 151

Melinda ASHLEY, individually and as guardian ad litem for Annelies Stranahan, a minor child, Respondent,

v.

Russell C. HALL and Jane Doe Hall, husband and wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Petitioners.

No. 66578-8.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued January 12, 1999.

Decided June 10, 1999.

Reed, McClure, William Hickman, Marilee C. Erickson, Seattle, for Petitioners.

Herrmann & Associates, Charles J. Herrmann, Spencer D. Freeman, Tacoma, for Respondent.

MADSEN, J.

At issue is whether the trial court erred in admitting a lay witness' opinion…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. OrtizWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Brown v. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Henderson v. TyrrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Sears v. Seattle Consolidated Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Miller v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. SentinelC3, Inc. v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Miller v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API