Legal Opinion

Ashley v. Hall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1999No. 66578-8PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

— At issue is whether the trial court erred in admitting a lay witness’ opinion that an auto accident involving a child pedestrian was unavoidable, and whether the admission, if error, was harmless where no objection was made to substantially similar testimony from the same witness earlier in the proceeding. The trial court overruled counsel’s objection to the second statement and a verdict was rendered in favor of the driver. The Court of Appeals reversed. We conclude that although admission of such lay opinion testimony was an abuse of discretion in this case, because counsel failed to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. OrtizWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Brown v. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Henderson v. TyrrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Sears v. Seattle Consolidated Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Miller v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. SentinelC3, Inc. v. HuntWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Miller v. KennyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API