Legal Opinion

Air Lift Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 28, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 5125PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOX, District Judge.

This case arises under § 4061(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 which imposes an excise tax of 8% on certain automobile parts and accessories sold by the manufacturer, producer and importer. Plaintiff by its complaint seeks a refund of the tax paid by it under that section for the period October 1, 1964 through December 31, 1964. The grounds of this request for a refund are that the tax was collected illegally since Air Lift was not the manufacturer of the goods in question.

By its counterclaim the government seeks to collect back taxes not paid by Air Lift for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Indian Motocycle Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Reinecke v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Travel Industries of Kansas, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. The Air Lift Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. Ace-Chicago Great Dane Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Holmes Limestone Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
  5. Browning Arms Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API