Reinecke v. Smith
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
In 1922 Douglas Smith, by five instruments, created as many trusts for the benefit, of his wife and four children. The trustees named were the grantor; a son who was a direct beneficiary of one of the trusts and a contingent beneficiary of the others; and a banking company, possessed of trust powers. Neither the grantor nor the corporate trustee was a cestui que trust under any of the writings. In each agreement it was stipulated:
“Anything herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding, this Trust may be modified or revoked at any time by an instrument in writing signed by Douglas Smith…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Reinecke v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by193 opinions
- Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Helvering v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Anderson v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Helvering v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. DarusmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.