Legal Opinion

Browning Arms Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 7, 2003No. 97-252TPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

The plaintiff, Browning Arms Company (Browning Arms), filed a complaint in this court for the recovery of “erroneously or illegally assessed and collected” excise taxes from the defendant. The plaintiff claims that from 1991 through 1993, Browning Arms paid excise taxes on firearms it sold, but mistakenly included the sale of exempt parts and accessories associated with the firearms in the calculation of the excise taxes paid to the government. According to the plaintiffs complaint, the Regional Director of the United States Department of the Treasury, Bureau of Alcohol,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Exac Corp. v. Neptune Measurement CoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Andrew Jergens Co. v. ConnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. Worthington Pump & Machinery Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  5. Boyle Valve Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perfect Form Manufacturing LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
  2. Perfect Form Manufacturing LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API