Legal Opinion

A. F. Young & Co. v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1918No. Docket No. 135PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Kent; Barton, J., presiding. Assumpsit by A. F. Young & Company against the Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Company for breach of a contract to transport certain potatoes. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

On January 2 and 4, 1912, plaintiff loaded and shipped on defendant’s line two carloads of potatoes from Brutus, Emmet county, Michigan, to its agent Joshua A. Cave, at Charleston, S. C. Each car contained 220 sacks, weighing about 165 pounds each, of seed potatoes, known as “Irish Cobblers.” They were raised by farmers near Brutus at so much per bushel, from seed furnished by plaintiff, to be delivered to plaintiff’s agent in Brutus, from whence they were to be shipped by plaintiff for seed on its plantation in South Carolina.

Plaintiff introduced testimony tending to show that the sacks…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. BurrowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Lardie v. Manistee & Northeastern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Loveland & Hinyan Co. v. WatersMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tann v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Purity Ice Cream & Dairy Co. v. Adams Express Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Ritchie v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Berkel & Co. Contractors v. Christman Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Standard Pickle Co. v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API