Legal Opinion · Dissent

Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance v. Adams

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 20, 1978No. Docket 77-4036Published

1DissentD. E. Holbrook, J.

This writer respectfully dissents from my learned brothers’ majority opinion.

The instant case involved two separate insurance policies issued by Allstate Insurance Com*367pany and Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company. Allstate insured Mr. Chi, the driver of the car in which defendant’s decedent was a passenger. The premium paid by Mr. Chi provided $20,000 in uninsured motorist coverage. Decedent’s estate was paid $20,000 by Allstate. Decedent was also covered under a policy her daughter had with Michigan Millers. The premium paid by decedent’s daughter provided $40,000 in uninsured motorist…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Blakeslee v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  4. Werley v. United Services Automobile AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Boettner v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API