Legal Opinion

Townsend, Gary v. Vallas, Paul

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 9, 2001No. 00-2522, 00-2999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Gary Townsend and Alex Riley brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) to challenge certain employment actions taken after the drowning death of a student in a Chicago public school. Named as defendants were the Chicago School Reform Board of Trustees (“the Board”) and two administrators who were sued in their individual capacities: Paul Valias, the Board’s Chief Executive Officer, and Marilyn Johnson, the General Counsel of the Board and the head of the Board’s Law Department. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gary Townsend v. Paul VallasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Miller v. CiconeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
  3. Moore, Richard A. v. Muncie Police FireCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API