Legal Opinion

Gary Townsend v. Paul Vallas

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 9, 2001No. 00-2522Published

1Opinion of the Court

256 F.3d 661 (7th Cir. 2001)

GARY TOWNSEND, Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

ALEX RILEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,

v.

PAUL VALLAS and MARILYN F. JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees,

and

CHICAGO SCHOOL REFORM BOARD OF TRUSTEES, also known as BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation, Defendant, Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 00-2522 & 00-2999

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

ARGUED JANUARY 19, 2001

DECIDED July 9, 2001

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 98 C 8080--William T.…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API