Legal Opinion

Valley Tree Service v. Jimenez

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 18, 1990No. 89CA0542PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge PIERCE.

The sole issue in this workmen’s compensation case is which party bears the burden of establishing whether the usual wage adjustments have been afforded to an employee when an employer reemploys or continues to employ a disabled worker at the same rate of pay which the employee received before the injury. The Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) ruled that such burden was on the employer, and we affirm that holding.

Claimant sustained an admitted industrial injury to his left arm, and later, he returned to the same position as ground-man with his previous employer,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Metals Climax, Inc. v. CisnerosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. Vail Associates, Inc. v. WestSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Atlantic & Pacific Insurance Co. v. BarnesColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Employers Mutual of Wausau v. EidsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Industrial Commission v. EwingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Postlewait v. Midwest BarricadeColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Cowin & Co. v. MedinaColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Fulton v. SoopersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Stampados v. Colorado D & S Enterprises, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Rockwell International v. TurnbullColorado Court of Appeals · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API