Legal Opinion

Scott v. Allstate Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1982No. 8126SC1002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

At issue on appeal is whether defendant was required to give plaintiff notice of nonrenewal of his collision coverage at the expiration of the policy’s stated period. If plaintiff was entitled to such notice, then there exists an issue as to whether notice was ever mailed and summary judgment was improper. See White v. Insurance Co., 226 N.C. 119, 36 S.E. 2d 923 (1946). We hold, however, that notice was not a material fact in the present action. The court properly ordered summary judgment.

Insurance policies are usually for a short period with provisions for renewal upon payment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Waynesville Security Bank v. Stuyvesant Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Kapahua v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  3. White v. Dixie Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. First National Bank in Sioux City v. WattsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Associates Financial Services of America, Inc. v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API