Legal Opinion
Former Employees of Apache Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 6, 1994No. Court No. 92-06-00404PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Carman, Judge:
Plaintiffs challenge the determination by the Secretary of Labor (Labor) that plaintiffs are ineligible for trade adjustment assistance under 19 U.S.C. § 2272 (1988). This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(d)(1) (1988) and, for the reasons which follow, enters judgment for defendant.
I. Background
Plaintiffs filed a petition for trade adjustment assistance on December 26,1991 in anticipation of layoffs that were due to begin on January 11,1992. Administrative Record (R.) at 2. At the time of filing, plaintiff were employed in the Denver, Colorado office of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. And Industrias Intercontinental, S.A. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Ceramica Regiomontanam, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. F. Ray MarshallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- Woodrum v. DonovanUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Julian R. Woodrum, Dennis Dorsey and Sherman Johnson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Great American Ins. Co. of NyUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Scottsdale Insurance Company v. FinemanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021