Legal Opinion
United States v. Conrad Williams and Wilbert McKenzie Conrad Williams
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 19, 1991No. 880, Dockets 90-1496, 90-1497PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
Conrad Williams appeals from his conviction by a jury for assaulting a federal officer in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111 (1988), use of a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1988), and conspiracy to steal government funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1988). Williams claims that his rights under the confrontation clause of the Sixth Amendment were violated when testimony concerning a confession by his codefendant, Wilbert McKenzie, was admitted at their joint trial. McKenzie’s confession was redacted and references to Williams were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. TutinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Noel Alvarado and Mayra SanabriaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Victor KiendraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. Carol Kozinski, Ilmi Fejzoski, James Havelka, Jeanette Martinez, James Brennan, James Abney, Mark Morgan, and Peter DemopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. JassCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SaninCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Benjamin Matthew Logan, Also Known as Matt LoganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.