Castro v. Tewksbury
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
This is an action of forcible entrv. The premises involved are situated in Contra Costa County, and consist of a hundred acres of land, with a dwelling-house thereon.
The plaintiff recovered a verdict for restitution of possession and damages in the sum of seven hundred dollars, which were trebled in the judgment.
The defendant moved for a new trial, which was denied, and then appealed from the judgment and order.
Two questions only need be considered:—
1. The alleged entry, whatever may have been its character, was made on the ninth day of June, 1880, and was into the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Willard v. WarrenNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Janson v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Hoag v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Frazier v. HanlonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- Merrill v. ForbesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Dahlquist v. MattsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Mastin v. MaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Orly v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Bell v. HaunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.