Legal Opinion

Merrill v. Forbes

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1863PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Solano County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court,

1Opinion of the CourtCrocker, J.

This is an action founded on an alleged unlawful entry and forcible detainer of a tract of land in Solano County, originally commenced before a Justice of the Peace, and appealed to the County Court, where it was tried before a jury, who rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for damages in the sum of two hundred and sixty-seven dollars and fifty cents, which was trebled in the judgment.

It appears that the plaintiff was in possession of the premises in controversy, as tenant of the owner, under an agreement to give one-third of the grain that he might raise thereon, delivered in sacks.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Castro v. TewksburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Bell v. HaunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Davies v. StarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API