Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Hanlon

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1855PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Whit op Error from the Connty Court of San Francisco County. The facts appear at length in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBryan, J.

Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

This was an action brought by the respondents against the appellants before a Justice of the Peace in and for the County of San Francisco, charging the defendant with making “forcible and unlawful entry upon, and unlawfully and forcibly detaining’’ fifty-vara lot, No. 809, in the city of San Francisco.

It appears by the record, that the respondents claimed the lot in question, and fenced the same in, and that the lot remained in that condition without further improvements for some time afterwards; that *157subsequently one Gauley, iu a peaceable manner, entered, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willard v. WarrenNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Brumfield v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1816

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Smith v. ReederOregon Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Wegner v. LubenowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Castro v. TewksburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API