Legal Opinion

State v. Nickerson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 3, 1987No. 18A86PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant’s first assignment of error deals with questions propounded to the defendant on cross-examination in regard to prior acts of misconduct by the defendant. The following colloquy took place during the cross-examination of the defendant:

Q. And when you saw Harold Johnson, you remembered an occasion seventeen or eighteen years ago when you threatened to pull a knife on him and told him to quit messing around with your girlfriend or you would kill him, didn’t you?

A. I don’t know nothing about this. Me and Harold is friends, right now.

Q. And so you were so enraged about…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. MilbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. BeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Rogers v. ScyphersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Frank R. Nickerson v. T.A. Lee Attorney General of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. Earl Richmond, Jr. v. Marvin L. Polk, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  3. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Lacey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Best v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API