Lacey v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Kevin Ross Lacey appeals from his convictions for one count of kidnapping and two counts of aggravated assault and battery and from the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial.
We affirm.
Appellant raises the following issues:
I. Does the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution of the United States as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 [83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) ] and Article 1 Section 6 of the Wyoming Constitution require a new trial for Appellant?
II. Does the confrontation…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Engberg v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Calene v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Urbigkit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Montoya v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Lacey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.