Legal Opinion

Wasserman v. City of Kenosha

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1935PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The complaint under attack upon this appeal describes a situation which was before this court in Lindemann v. Kenosha, 206 Wis. 364, 240 N. W. 373. The facts there pleaded did not constitute a cause of action. Unless the allegations in this complaint with relation to conspiracy and the apprehension on the part of the city of Kenosha and its officials that the revenues of the city might be reduced if the buildings contemplated were to be erected, and that the officers of the city were influenced by a fear that they would not be re-elected unless the permit was revoked, present additional…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Land, Log & Lumber Co. v. McIntyreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. State ex rel. Rose v. Superior Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Langen v. BorkowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Lowe v. ConroyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin SystemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Lifer Ex Rel. Grutzner v. RaymondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. T & M HOMES, INC. v. Township of MansfieldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. Shellburne, Inc. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API