Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of R.A.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 29, 1985No. C4-85-814PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Following a two day hearing, the trial court determined that R.A. and J.A. were neglected by their parents and that R.A. was also a victim of domestic child abuse. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

FACTS

Valerie and David A. were married on October 3, 1981. Two children were born of their marriage: R.A., born April 12, 1982, and J.A., born September 4, 1984. In October 1984, Big Stone County Family Services received a report that R.A. had been abused by Valerie; however, that report was unsubstantiated at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of Welfare of SharpSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Matter of Welfare of C. ChildrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. In Re the Welfare of M.M.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of S.A.V.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. In Re the Welfare of S.A.V.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. In re the Welfare of J.K.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API